Summary of the Systematic Review
The Validity of the Acoustic Breathiness Index in the Evaluation of Breathy Voice Quality: A Meta-Analysis
Barsties, V. Latoszek, B., Kim, G. H., et al. (2020).
Clinical Otolaryngology, Epub retrieved August 17, 2020 from https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13629.
Go to Article
Indicators of Review Quality
- Yes The review states a clearly focused question/aim.
- Yes Criteria for inclusion of studies are provided.
- Yes Search strategy described in sufficient detail for replication.
- Yes Included studies are assessed for study quality.
- Yes Quality assessments are reproducible.
- Yes Characteristics of the included studies are provided.
This is a systematic review of published and grey literature investigating the use of the Acoustic Breathiness Index in individuals to assess breathy voice quality.
The following aims were provided:
- use cross-validation studies to estimate the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the Acoustic Breathiness Index; and
- to calculate an overall weighted threshold of Acoustic Breathiness Index using all included studies.
Individuals with and without voice disorders
Acoustic Breathiness Index
Number of Studies Included
2017 to February 2020
Conclusions from This Systematic Review
What are Conclusions?
Go to Map
The Acoustic Breathiness Index (ABI) was indicated to have sufficient to high diagnostic accuracy with high to very high sensitivity (0.84) and specificity (0.92) levels. The high specificity, with low heterogeneity, demonstrated that almost all participants with absence of breathiness were correctly classified as such. Therefore, ABI was revealed to be a robust and valid instrument to objectively measure breathiness.