Summary of the Systematic Review

Article Citation

Constraint-Induced Aphasia Therapy for Patients With Aphasia: A Systematic Review

Wang, G., Ge, L., et al. (2020).
International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 7(3), 349-358.
Go to Article

Sponsoring Body

No funding received

Article Quality Ratings

Read about Our Rating Process

Indicators of Review Quality

  • Yes The review states a clearly focused question/aim.
  • Yes Criteria for inclusion of studies are provided.
  • Yes Search strategy described in sufficient detail for replication.
  • Yes Included studies are assessed for study quality.
  • Yes Quality assessments are reproducible.
  • Yes Characteristics of the included studies are provided.

Article Details

Description

This is a review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials investigating constraint-induced aphasia therapy in adults with aphasia.

Questions/Aims Addressed

This article aimed to evaluate the effects of constraint-induced therapy on patients with aphasia.

Population

Adults with aphasia

Intervention/Assessment

Constraint-induced aphasia

Number of Studies Included

12

Years Included

Inception to October 2019


Conclusions from This Systematic Review

What are Conclusions?

Go to Map

Treatment

The results of the meta-analysis demonstrated varied effect size (MD) based on the assessment measure used. Results demonstrated that constraint-induced therapy had a significant effect on oral language and naming outcomes as measured by the Western Aphasia Battery (MD = 1.23), but no significant difference was demonstrated on outcomes as measured by the Boston Naming Test (MD = -1.79) and the Aachen Aphasia Test (MD = -4.49). These findings indicated that constraint-induced therapy may potentially improve language performance (e.g., naming, comprehension, repetition, written language, oral language). Results, however, were limited due to the poor methodological quality of the included trials.

Keywords: Constraint-Induced Treatment

Our Partners